Each week there seems to be an emergency-style power grab, that steering huge parts of American society–from the top down. Authoritarian concerns are not just about the politics, but our leadership’s habit of treating normal checks and limits like annoying suggestions.
Trump is tightening his grip on the federal government by making it easier to fire and replace career civil servants in policy jobs, weakening traditional job protections, and sidelining internal watchdogs that protect workers from political retaliation. At the same time, he has issued orders that pull supposedly independent agencies—like the FTC, SEC, FCC, and key financial regulators—under closer White House control, forcing them to align their budgets, regulations, and legal interpretations with presidential priorities instead of acting at arm’s length. Together, these changes shift power away from neutral experts and semi‑independent commissions and concentrate it in the presidency, reducing long‑standing checks on how any one president can use the machinery of the federal government.
Trump and his advisers have pursued a multi-pronged strategy to strip protections from experienced career officials and create conditions where loyalists can be hired or promoted in their place, largely by reclassifying tens of thousands of civil servants as “at‑will” political-adjacent employees and driving out existing staff at scale.
Trump and his allies have repeatedly pressured DOJ to act as an instrument of “retribution” against critics, while claiming they are merely “ending weaponization” from the prior administration. DOJ leadership under Attorney General Pam Bondi has removed or sidelined career officials from politically sensitive cases and replaced some with openly pro‑Trump loyalists, including at least one January 6 rioter, prompting warnings from Senate Judiciary Chair Dick Durbin that DOJ is being turned into the president’s “personal police force.”
Trump has backed and encouraged a broad set of efforts that would tighten voting rules, particularly around mail voting, voter ID, proof of citizenship, and voter-roll purges, which civil-rights groups and many election experts say would disproportionately burden young, poor, disabled, and nonwhite voters.
In 2026, a new rule will change the classification of about 50,000 workers, removing their appeal protections and making it easier to fire them. Unions have criticized this move as a return to political favoritism, and several groups are challenging the rule, leading to job insecurity and pressure to comply.
Trump has finalized a new federal personnel rule that makes it much easier for his administration to reclassify and fire tens of thousands of career civil servants involved in policymaking, in ways critics say are designed to purge or intimidate employees who are seen as resisting his agenda.
The Trump administration has been aggressively firing, sidelining, or targeting both senior military leaders and retired officers seen as disloyal, which experts warn is eroding the norm of an apolitical military and pressuring the chain of command to follow any order he labels “lawful.”
The Trump administration is rapidly expanding surveillance powers and “domestic extremism” frameworks in ways that civil liberties groups warn can be used against protest movements and left‑leaning organizers.