Tag: donald-trump
-
Judges Lean Partisan
Sep 21, 2025
Samuel Alito, known for reliable votes supporting right-wing and executive power positions, has been scrutinized over undisclosed trips and connections to conservative advocacy groups (as well as flag controversies involving his household). He is statistically the court’s most conservative justice. [1]
Justice Clarence Thomas is extremely conservative, nearly always aligns with Alito and is a frequent leader of the most partisan bloc. His repeated headlines about unreported gifts, luxury trips, and financial benefits from conservative donors have raised major ethical concerns in 2024 and 2025, with Senate hearings and investigative journalism coverage. [2]
Neil Gorsuch often aligns with the conservative bloc of Thomas and Alito on key issues. Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett are also conservative but are perceived as somewhat more moderate. John Roberts, the Chief Justice, has shifted right but remains the likely conservative swing vote, occasionally siding with liberals in close cases.
By contrast, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson are seen as left-leaning but have mostly stayed out of major ethics controversies. Their dissenting opinions align with Democratic views.
The combination of ethical concerns and partisan leanings fuels distrust and threatens the Court’s role as a fair, impartial guardian of democracy. The consequences of this erosion are felt by everyday Americans in their rights, protections, and faith in government institutions.
SOURCES
-
Nothing, AZ #018
Sep 12, 2025 | Postscape #018
As of late 2025, congressional oversight of the Trump administration is plagued by delays and partisan disputes, especially regarding Jeffrey Epstein-related files. Tensions increased after a controversial letter from the President was found in Epstein’s birthday book. The President’s executive order to close the Department of Education faced little resistance from Congress, raising doubts about oversight effectiveness. The administration’s investigations are seen as distractions. Concerns about transparency remain due to the Department of Justice’s lack of cooperation with oversight requests and ongoing legal disputes related to executive orders on education and civil rights, highlighting tensions between government branches.
Stalled congressional oversight and new policies from the administration could hurt everyday Arizonans. Proposed cuts to federal funding for Medicaid and SNAP threaten healthcare and food security for many, including over 1 million children. The removal of clean energy tax credits risks billions in investments and thousands of jobs, leading to higher future energy costs. Additionally, new tariffs on imported goods may raise prices on everyday items, while a federal freeze on research grants could negatively impact local universities and tribal communities, affecting important projects and services. Overall, these policy changes could result in economic uncertainty, higher living costs, and reduced access to essential social services.
SOURCES
T W I W C 